Well-founded and stable semantics of logic programs with aggregates
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we present a framework for the semantics and the computation of aggregates in the context of logic programming. In our study, an aggregate can be an arbitrary interpreted second order predicate (or function). We define extensions of the KripkeKleene, the well-founded and the stable semantics for aggregate programs. The semantics is based on the concept of a three-valued immediate consequence operator of an aggregate program. Such an operator approximates the standard two-valued immediate consequence operator of the program, and induces a unique Kripke-Kleene model, a unique well-founded model and a collection of stable models. We study different ways of defining such operators and thus obtain a framework of semantics, offering different trade-offs between precision and tractability. In particular, we investigate conditions on the operator that guarantee that the computation of the three types of semantics remains on the same level as for logic programs without aggregates. Other results show that, in practice, even efficient threevalued immediate consequence operators which are very low in the precision hierarchy, still provide optimal precision.
منابع مشابه
Semantics of Logic Programs withAggregatesDavid
We investigate the semantics of aggregates (count, sum, : : :) in logic programs with function symbols and negation. In particular we address the meaning of programs with recursion through aggregation. We extend the two most successful semantic approaches to the problem of recursion through negation, well founded models and stable models, to programs with aggregates. We examine previously deene...
متن کاملUnfounded Sets and Well-Founded Semantics of Answer Set Programs with Aggregates
Logic programs with aggregates (LP) are one of the major linguistic extensions to Logic Programming (LP). In this work, we propose a generalization of the notions of unfounded set and well-founded semantics for programs with monotone and antimonotone aggregates (LPm,a programs). In particular, we present a new notion of unfounded set for LPm,a programs, which is a sound generalization of the or...
متن کاملReconciling Well-Founded Semantics of DL-Programs and Aggregate Programs
Logic programs with aggregates and description logic programs (dl-programs) are two recent extensions to logic programming. In this paper, we study the relationships between these two classes of logic programs, under the well-founded semantics. The main result is that, under a satisfaction-preserving mapping from dl-atoms to aggregates, the well-founded semantics of dl-programs by Eiter et al.,...
متن کاملWell-Founded Semantics for Logic Programs with Aggregates: Implementation and Experimentation
Aggregate constructs are one of the major linguistic extensions to logic programming. In this paper, we focus on logic programming with monotone and antimonotone aggregate literals with the well-founded semantics defined in [1], which allows for aggregates occurring in recursive definitions. We formally show that computing this semantics is tractable and present a prototype system obtained by m...
متن کاملDeclarative and Computational Properties of Logic Programs with Aggregates
We investigate the properties of logic programs with aggregates. We mainly focus on programs with monotone and antimonotone aggregates (LPAm,a programs). We define a new notion of unfounded set for LPAm,a programs, and prove that it is a sound generalization of the standard notion of unfounded set for aggregate-free programs. We show that the answer sets of an LPAm,a program are precisely its u...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- TPLP
دوره 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007